jump to navigation

D’Souza Beautifully Refuted Sunday, April 22, 2007

Posted by henry000 in atheism, Dinesh D'Souza, faith, rationality, religion, Virginia Tech Massacre.
trackback

As pointed out in my earlier post, Dinesh D’Souza has taken advantage of the Virginia Tech Shooting to advance his personal hatred for atheists. He started with a shameful post titled “Where is atheism when bad things happen?”, which has caused a stir on the Internet, and has been refuted by an atheist professor at Virginia Tech – please take time to read his heartening, moving and sincere piece of writing.

D’Souza has since came up with one more misguided and juvenile post, in which he continues to dig his own hole. The readers, both atheists and theists, have refuted him much better than I could possibly do, so there is no need for me to add anything more. The only comment I would like to make is that we should waste no more time on D’Souza after this. It is not worth your time.

Advertisements

Comments»

1. nullifidian - Sunday, April 22, 2007

Absolutely.

2. unitedcats - Tuesday, May 1, 2007

People who use human tragedy to promote their own religious belief are more proof that “Satan does his finest work in the name of the Lord.” Politicians who do the same are just scum (sorry, I felt compelled to toss that in.)

3. soraPoist - Friday, November 16, 2007

Two new studies show why some people are more attractive for members of the opposite sex than others.

The University of Florida, Florida State University found that physically attractive people almost instantly attract the attention of the interlocutor, sobesednitsy with them, literally, it is difficult to make eye. This conclusion was reached by a series of psychological experiments, which were determined by the people who believe in sending the first seconds after the acquaintance. Here, a curious feature: single, unmarried experimental preferred to look at the guys, beauty opposite sex, and family, people most often by representatives of their sex.

The authors believe that this feature developed a behavior as a result of the evolution: a man trying to find a decent pair to acquire offspring. If this is resolved, he wondered potential rivals. Detailed information about this magazine will be published Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

In turn, a joint study of the Rockefeller University, Rockefeller University and Duke University, Duke University in North Carolina revealed that women are perceived differently by men smell. During experiments studied the perception of women one of the ingredients of male pheromone-androstenona smell, which is contained in urine or sweat.

The results were startling: women are part of this repugnant odor, and the other part is very attractive, resembling the smell of vanilla, and the third group have not felt any smell. The authors argue that the reason is that the differences in the receptor responsible for the olfactory system, from different people are different.

It has long been proven that mammals (including human) odor is one way of attracting the attention of representatives of the opposite sex. A detailed article about the journal Nature will publish.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: