jump to navigation

Awesome Video Refuting Creation Museum Monday, July 9, 2007

Posted by henry000 in anti-creationism, anti-evolution, anti-fundamentalism, creation museum, creationism, evolution, fundamentalism, geology, Kentucky, rationality, science, video.
trackback

Here is yet another video refuting the stupidity that is of the creation museum, but this time with a twist. This video shows that the museum is built right on an area rich in fossils and geological features!

Although undoubtly videos like this or anything else is not going to convince the dogmatic and ignorant creationists, this video is quite educational and well-made, worth your time going through it. PZ Myers has already declared this to be one of the most effective refutation.

Courtesy of Richard Dawkins .net.

Advertisements

Comments»

1. Quality matters « blueollie - Tuesday, July 10, 2007

[…] Evolution has a nice video: Here is yet another video refuting the stupidity that is of the creation museum, but this time […]

2. Activist - Tuesday, July 10, 2007

What is up with you people? One person makes a video that supposedly offers “irrefutable” evidence against creationism, and every pro-evolution site in the world puts it up!

By the way, creationists don’t deny the existence of fossils, nor of geologic strata. We just know that they don’t prove evolution, nor that the earth is millions of years old.

We’re still waiting to see the transitional fossils that prove one type of animal supposedly evolved into another type.

3. h3nry - Tuesday, July 10, 2007

There are a great number of transitional fossils found already. Differences between types of animals might not shown in fossils since fossils only represent differences in fossils, not in the many great number of soft tissues and other traits. Dogs evolved from wolves as we all know – and there are no transitional fossils between these two types of animals.

4. Activist - Monday, July 16, 2007

henry, if you put all known fossils and skeletal remains in a row in the order supposedly representing evolution, there are TONS of gaps. Just one example: Where are the transitional fossils or skeletons of the animals between the giraffe and horse, or whatever it supposedly evolved from? There should be evidence of all kinds of animals with increasing neck lengths, but you don’t find any such evidence. You have the short-neck animal and the long-neck animal, with nothing in between.

5. fred - Wednesday, March 26, 2008

of course there are gaps – fossilisation is a rare occurrance. does the existance of gaps somehow prove god – and if so, how does it prove god – i mean prove it, not just ‘that’s what my mum, dad and church taught me’ – that’s not proof.

and yes there are fossils of changing neck length, proto horses etc – not complete – not complete yet, and perhaps never complete and they don’t need to be complete – but from time to time new ones are found, shrinking the available space for your god, whichever one you have been brought up to believe in

6. Roptom - Wednesday, November 12, 2008

That was very indepth and interesting but where is the irafutable proof?, all this is is an evolutionery conclusion to the avaliable data, creationist’s with a different mind set will arrive at a different conclusion after studying the same data, and why do athiests allways come back with the same boring canard, “what is your proof of a GOD”, boring!
An intelligent person will see that there is flaws in both creationists theory’s and evolutionist theory’s, and if you just paper mache over those flaws, you really are just bullshiting yourselves!,

landl47 - Tuesday, August 31, 2010

You are confusing ‘flaws’ with areas where the evidence is still being gathered, but all the evidence which has been gathered is consistent with the theory, in the case of evolution, and no evidence at all, in the case of creationism. In neither case are there flaws. Everything found in the last 150 years confirms the essential validity of Darwin’s work, and there is no scientific evidence at all for creationism, nor has there ever been. It’s a purely religious phenomenon. You are free to believe what you want, but don’t confuse creationism with science. If I tell you that the world was created by a yellow cat in another galaxy, you can’t disprove it, but it has no scientific basis. It’s as valid, or invalid, as any other belief-based hypothesis.

7. Tim Helble - Saturday, January 17, 2009

Does anyone know the precise location of this site in Cold Spring? Is it on Highway 27? I want to visit it next time I’m in northern Kentucky.

Thanks!

8. Tony - Saturday, October 23, 2010

heya all,
My name is Tony, I am a Creationist,
care to debate me, ok
email me and we cant start
but I wonder, if you are the kind that dont believe no matter what the evidence?
my email is gthawkings@hotmail.com, see ya there, and oh I will debate you all at one time if you like: me vs. all evolutionists…

9. Tony - Wednesday, November 3, 2010

I can see that all evilutionists are chicken. non has reply to my post. Hey, I am a Creationist, debate me if you dare!!!
However dont waste my time with proof that have been proving false!!! and there has never been any transitional fossils whatever you believe, and oh YOU KNOW THAT EVILUTION IS A RELIGION RIGHT!!??

10. Tony - Wednesday, November 3, 2010

Four Great Questions
1. Who am I (and what am I worth?)
2. Where did I come from?
3. Why am I here?
4. Where am I going when I die?

“Amazing! A ‘Big Bang’ made this world from nothing!”Humanist world-view based on evolution: Man is god and answers to no one.

“Incredible design! There must be a smart designer.”Creationist world-view: God is God and judges all men.

“If you tell a lie long enough, loud enough and often enough, the people will believe it.”-Adolph Hitler
The Third Reich at War p. 38

“People are more likely to believe a big liethan a small one.”-Adolph Hitler

Webster’s Dictionary
Science n. [< scire, to know] 1. Systematized knowledge derived from observation, study, etc.

The word “Evolution” has many meanings, only one of which is scientific.
1. Cosmic Evolution: the origin of time, space and matter, i.e. Big Bang.
2. Chemical Evolution- the origin of higher elements from hydrogen.
3. Stellar and Planetary evolution. Origin of stars and planets. No one has ever seen a star form.
4. Organic Evolution. Origin of Life.
5. Macro-Evolution. Changing from one kind into another.
6. Micro-Evolution. Variations within kinds. Only this one has been observed.
The first five are RELIGIOUS but the 6th is observable and provable and can be study.

11. Tony - Wednesday, November 3, 2010

First Law of Thermodynamics:
“Matter (and/or energy) cannot be created or destroyed”

“Humanists regard the universe as self existing and not created.”
Humanist Manifesto 1 (1933) Tenent #1

Uni=single
verse=spoken sentence

And God said, “Let there be light …”
Genesis 1:3

1. Where did the matter come from?
2. Where did the laws come from? Gravity, centrifugal force, inertia, etc. (and why aren’t the laws still evolving?)
3. Where did the energy come from?

12. Tony - Wednesday, November 3, 2010

Conservation of Angular Momentum

“This (Angular Momentum) would have caused the sun to spin very rapidly. Actually, our sun spins very slowly, while the planets move very rapidly around the sun. In fact, although the sun has over 99% of the mass of the solar system, it has only 2% of the angular momentum. This pattern is directly opposite to the pattern predicted for the nebular hypothesis.”
Dr. H. Reeves The Origin of the Solar System, in The Origin of the Solar System, Dermott, S.F. Ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York p. 9, 1978.

“The ultimate origin of the solar system’s angular momentum remains obscure.” Well-known solar-system Evolutionist scientist, Dr. Stuart Ross Taylor, Solar System Evolution: A New Perspective, Cambridge University Press, p. 53, 1992.

“One of the detailed problems is then to explain how the Sun itself acquires nearly 99.9% of the mass of the solar system but only 2% of its angular momentum.”
Frank D. Stacey, “Physics of the Earth”, 1969, p. 4

Venus, Uranus and possibly Pluto rotate backwards from the other 6 planets.
8 of the 91 moons rotate backwards.
Jupiter, Saturn and Neptune have moons orbiting in both directions. Astronomical Almanac for the year 1989 (Wash. DC U.S. Government Printing Office, 1989) p. E88

13. Tony - Wednesday, November 3, 2010

CHEMISTRY “MYSTERIES”

98% OF THE SUN IS HYDROGEN OR HELIUM
LESS THAN 1% OF MERCURY, VENUS, EARTH, AND MARS IS HYDROGEN OR HELIUM
Why are the nine planets so different from each other and from the sun?
Some galaxies spin backwards.

If the big bang theory were true the matter would be evenly distributed.
Instead it is “lumpy.” There are clusters of stars then great “voids.”
The “big bang” is a “big dud.”

14. Tony - Wednesday, November 3, 2010

THE SECOND LAW OF THERMALDYNAMICS

“Another way of stating the second law is, ‘The universe is constantly getting more disorderly.’ Viewed that way we can see the second law all about us. We have to work hard to straighten out a room, but left to itself it becomes a mess again very quickly and very easily. Even if we never enter it, it becomes dusty and musty. How difficult to maintain houses, and machinery, and our own bodies in perfect working order; how easy to let them deteriorate. In fact, all we have to do is nothing, and everything deteriorates, collapses, breaks down, wears out, all by itself-and that is what the second law is all about.
Issac Asimov, “In the Game of Energy and Thermodynamics You Can’t Even Break Even,” Smithsonian Institution Journal, June 1970 p. 6

Evolutionists assume that adding energy (open system) will overcome the 2nd law of thermodynamics.

1.The universe is a closed system.
2. Adding energy is destructive without a complex mechanism to harness the energy.

Only a very complex molecule called chlorophyll can harness the sun’s energy.
One leaf cell is more complex than a city.

Evolution theory violates the second law and is wrong.

15. knight - Tuesday, March 29, 2011

Hey blind rambling guy: the mainsteamer cult’s claim of how the solar system formed was refuted last year: http://truthspot.tk

And speaking of refutations, why is it that no evolutionist or mainstreamer has been able to refute a single thing on my blog? That silence speaks volumes.

16. knight - Tuesday, March 29, 2011
17. knight - Tuesday, March 29, 2011

You could avoid your stupid mistakes if u stopped assuming things and used a search engie for something other than, “why bibble wrong, show me video that tells me everting me need 2 no so i dont have to do hard work by acshually studying somting but can just have sex and masturbation fun and Grand teft auto dah next day”, dude.

Liberals are truly morons.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: